Are they Representatives, Or Aren't They?
In a recent article, Tom Loftus explains that tax hikes are most likely off the table in any potential special session:
When Gov. Steve Beshear announced April 30 that his budget staff anticipated a revenue shortage of between $800 million and $1.1 billion, he said all options, including higher taxes, must be considered in dealing with the problem.
But Beshear, a Democrat, said in a statement released last week, "It is becoming increasingly clear that now is not the time to raise taxes on working families and small businesses."
House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, made a nearly identical comment the previous week.
And Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville, made his position clear at the Republican Party's Lincoln Day Dinner on May 9 in Louisville when he said, "We've given this governor as much money as he's going to get."
What's strange to us, is this quote from Kentucky Youth Advocates executive director Terry Brooks:
"Spending cuts alone are not going to resolve the deficit, nor are tax increases alone. It has to be a combination," said Terry Brooks, executive director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, which lobbies for programs that help needy families. "If taxes are off the table, then it means the leaders in Frankfort have decided that re-election is more important than kids and families."
Really Terry?
Spending cuts alone can solve the deficit, we assure you. You just reduce spending until it matches revenues, like Minnesota.
Secondly, in what situation is it unimportant to represent your constituents? If holding the line on spending is what is desired by the citizens you represent, than it is more important than the spending you personally desire.
